Evernomics vs. Austrians

SVET Is Light, by Svet and Victor

Rothbard, as all other apologists of Austrian school, is fast in condemning neo keynesians for their defense of govs interferences into free market economies (Murray N. Rothbard. Economic Thought Before Adam Smith) . Naturally, even less sympathies does the labor theory of value get from him. Rothbard blames it on non other than Saint Thomas Aquinas with his Summa Theologica.

At the same time, being himself a part of the Institutional Construct (which is, of course, The Ludwig von Mises Institute for Austrian Economics, founded by Rothbard and his followers in 1982) he stands firm, defending its strategic objectives to over-survive competing Constructs.

He, simply, can’t accept the notion that all economic theories (including his own — libertarian), which were built on the base of Greco-Roman (and later Christian) traditions, are incapable to abstract themselves from the on-going fight between two-sided group of Institutions, one of which is historically adherent to Platonic (ideals based, tyrannic) and another to Aristotelian (laws based, democratic) Artificial Constructs.

Consequently, both of those institutional armies staunchly reject each others main philosophical theses, one of which states that humans can and must govern their own destinies according to their undefined, idyllic, divine inner-selfs, and another — that only the material, atomic, quantifiable world exists and humans must act accordingly, subjugating themselves to the overwhelming force of entropy.

In contrast, Evernomics accepts humans intellectually evolving into the surrounding Universe through their limited perception apparatus, evolutionary wired to strive for the Eternity. Building Institutional Constructs and, then, fighting for their timeless supremacy is the most primitive way of how we exhibit ourself in recorded history, including that of the, so-called, ‘economic theories’.

Accordingly, by the sheer power of our collective (consensus) will, we are not only capable to erect those non-human Constructs in order to self-sacrifice to them, but also to limit their size and power rejecting their main Pythagorean ‘Table of Opposites’ arguments by fusing those arguments into the one, emotionally unified perception.

That perception is, then, to be hold by consensus among as many of us as possible to prevent the formation of the next generation of over-sized, human-less Constructs.

For more:





Angel Investor (20+ years), Serial Entrepreneur (14+ companies), Author (> 1M views), Founder of Evernomics, 40+ Countries

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

3 Things No One Told You About Meaningful Living

A Schopenhauer Notebook: Page 2

Parts, wholes, abstracts, tropes and ontology — 3:16

Best Philosophy Rooms in Clubhouse

54 lessons for entrepreneurs from Ryan Holiday’s new book Conspiracy, on Peter Thiel’s takedown of…

What Sociobiologists and the Intellectual Dark Web Have in Common

five Reasons to learn Astrology and How It Can Help Your Personal Growth

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store


Angel Investor (20+ years), Serial Entrepreneur (14+ companies), Author (> 1M views), Founder of Evernomics, 40+ Countries

More from Medium

My mission to build a new financial market

Questioning Web3 Framing

dApps and Protocols Accelerating the adoption rate of Web3: Part 1

As a Service… The Outsourcing of the Blockchain